Skip to main content

Posts

New Command 6

 INFO: Good news: the B side uses os-patch , the same as the A side. inventories/ref_rbb/hosts_ref_rbb.yml sets os_patch_url: "http://{{ ansible_address }}/os-patch/" . os_patch.yml builds the patch repo from that ( baseurl: "{{ os_patch_url }}" ). So the playbook creates the patch repo pointing at os-patch , which is the folder you just fixed. The rhel-8-baseos address only appears in the eden_rbb inventories, which aren't part of this run. One last check. {{ ansible_address }} is the master's IP, filled in for each server. Earlier, vlim04 and vlim05 had the A master's address ( .61 ) in their old rbb-base file. Confirm every B server will use the B master ( .62 ): ansible 'rbb-ref-b-*' -i inventories/ref_rbb/hosts_ref_rbb.yml --ask-vault-pass -m debug -a "msg={{ os_patch_url }}" This doesn't log in to the servers. It just prints the address each one will use. All of them show http://10.212.176.62/os-patch/ : run Step ...
Recent posts

New Command 5

 INFO: Nothing here blocks patching. You can go ahead with Step 3. Here's what the output shows: The duplicates are harmless. On vstat, vlip02, vlip03, vlim02 and vlip06, rbb-base is in two files: rbb_patches_07012025.repo (an old copy from July 2025) and rbb_rhel_patches.repo . Both copies are identical: same address, and both switched off ( enabled = 0 ). dnf just warns about it. vlim03's red FAILED is not a problem. grep returns code 1 when it finds nothing, so vlim03 simply has no rbb-base repo at all. vlim04 and vlim05 point at the A-side master. Their rbb-base uses 10.212.176.61 (A), while the other B servers use .62 (B). It's switched off, so it doesn't affect this run, but it isn't consistent with the rest. One quick check before Step 4. These rbb-base files point to /rhel-8-baseos/ , not /os-patch/ . On the A side, the patch run used a repo called os-base that the playbook creates, and that pointed at os-patch . That's why fixing os-pat...

New Command 4

 INFO: That worked. Every B server shows CHANGED | rc=0 and "files removed", so the old repo lists are cleared. vlim06 is unreachable, as expected. The "not registered" and Python warning lines are normal on these servers. Something new to look at: a few servers (vlim02, vlim03, vlip03, vlip06) say "Repository rbb-base is listed more than once in the configuration" . That means two .repo files on those servers both define a repo called rbb-base . dnf uses only one of them, so it's a warning, not an error. But if the two copies point at different places, the server may not be looking where you expect. To see both copies: ansible 'rbb-ref-b-*:!rbb-ref-b-vlim06' -i inventories/ref_rbb/hosts_ref_rbb.yml --ask-vault-pass -u dbv6admin -b -m shell \ -a "grep -n -A3 '^\[rbb-base\]' /etc/yum.repos.d/*.repo" If both copies have the same baseurl , it's harmless and can be tidied up after patching. If they differ, send me the out...

New Command 3

 INFO: These results are almost identical to the last run, which tells us the servers were still checking against an old copy of the repo list. Two things caused that. The B master is still running the old script. The message reads "dnf reports a conflict. Run: dnf update --assumeno", which is the 1.4 wording. Version 1.4.1 would also print dnf: lines underneath. The servers reused yesterday's repo list. When dnf reads a repo, it keeps a copy of the package list and reuses it for up to 48 hours. So the B servers checked against the list from before you added the 8 AppStream RPMs, and couldn't see them. That's why vlim03 still asks for perl and gcc. I've fixed the second one in the script: version 1.4.2 makes the dry run read the repo fresh every time. I've attached the script, the README (Word and PDF) and the pseudocode, all updated. Next steps: Copy os_patch_wizard.sh v1.4.2 to rbb-ref-b-ansible , replacing the old one. Check it with: grep...

03/21

 Today was a bit tough but notice the plan allows for one substitution of the shake with a protein.  So the wife and I decided to grill 4oz of chicken with a small salad.  Chicken with a little italian seasoning (no salt) and lemon juice covering salad.  After two days of shakes :) it was glorious! G 290lb

Single Step

  Starting a new weight loss journey today.  I will be working with Houston Methodist Hospital Medical Weight Management Center.  Met with the staff today and it seems to be a very positive environment. I am a bit worried about starting this process but glad I'm starting.   Details:  In this program, I will be placed on a Very Low Calorie Diet (VLCD), which involves consuming 800 calories in the form of meal replacements and no more than 50 grams of carbohydrates per day. My body should respond by going into ketosis, a metabolic state in which the body uses fat stores as its primary energy (ketone bodies).  And I have a lot of fat stored.   Start Date 3/14.   G